chr 500-0bchr 500-0bchr 500-0bchr 500-0b
  • Home
  • About
    • DSI-NRF Flagship
    • Partnerships
    • Funders
    • Staff
    • Reports
  • Research Platforms
    • Areas of Focus
      • Aesthetic Education and the Becoming Technical of the Human
      • Migrating Violence
      • Political Theory and Philosophy
      • Visual History and Theory
      • Kinetic Objects
      • Communicating the Humanities
    • NRF SARChI Chair in Visual History & Theory
      • Postgraduate bursaries and postdoctoral fellowships in Visual History & Theory
      • Postgraduate Module In Visual History, 2023 (HIS 735/835)
    • Andrew W. Mellon Chair of Aesthetic Theory and Material Performance
    • Factory of the Arts
      • About the Factory of the Arts
      • Convening the Factory of the Arts
      • Artists in Residence
    • Laboratory of Kinetic Objects
    • Other Universals
    • Seminar Programme
    • Publications
  • Greatmore
  • Fellowship Programme
    • Fellows
    • Winter School
    • Visiting Scholars
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
    • Galleries
    • Film
  • Events
    • Workshops
    • Conferences
    • Lectures
    • Special Meetings
    • Colloquia
    • Seminars
    • Exhibitions
    • Arts Events
  • News
  • Contact
✕

The Curricular and the Global, the Tropic and the Taxonomic

Convening an interdisciplinary and geographically diverse group of humanistic scholars and public intellectuals, primarily from Africa, the Cape Town Global Humanities Curriculum workshop offered a venue for discussing the ideas, methods, and practices of “the global” – both in relation to the local and the regional and as a critical step towards creating an intellectually challenging and institutionally effective global humanities curriculum.

Funded by The Andrew W. Mellon and Volkswagen Foundations, the workshop took place on December 10 and 11, 2018 in Cape Town.  It was co-organized by Homi Bhabha at the Mahindra Humanities Center at Harvard University and Premesh Lalu of the Centre for Humanities Research at the University of the Western Cape.


On the first day, Director of the Mahindra Humanities Centre Homi Bhabha outlined a series of suggestive points of departure for the workshop. Bhabha, in recounting a moment in which he was asked to respond to an international workshop in the form of a report, drew out how it is the notion of the curriculum was the organising concept around which the humanities might centre its inquiry into thinking the global in all its manifestations in and out of the university. For Bhabha, the report or the syllabus as it is used in the educational institution could not think outside of the spatial, and it is in the curricular that an emphasis on temporality can be pursued. The curriculum, Bhabha argued, makes something else available — an ethical confidence from its etymology, and a narrativised sense of the ‘way in which heterogenous and contingent issues might come to shape a life like a curriculum’. Such an imagining speaks to issues and constituencies wider than the university or the educational establishment as such and intervenes effectively with civil and political society.

Following the brief of the workshop, a concept of the global in relation to notions of the taxonomic and the tropic were placed on the table. The notions of the taxonomic and the tropic — terms that would come to circulate in discussions over the two days — are set up as a way in which to attend to the changing nature of the university and its increasing corporatization as much as it is also a manner in which to attend to entrenched disciplinary conditions under which the global is imagined. The idea of the global as the humanities is forced to encounter it in the contemporary university, as Bhabha outlined it, is one that must be seen as a presentist entrapment: closed to other forms of interconnectivity historically. Bhabha asked, what is it about the global that had become so marketable? In a sense the global was a failed attempt to think about scale, one that could not escape the entrapments of its own binaries and oppositions. Suggesting that we think the global in particular ways in relation to the taxonomic and the tropic, Bhabha marked the ways in which the global acts as a claim: a claim to inclusion, a claim to justice, and an ethical claim. The global rendered in this way emphasises forms of value and meaning constituted in circulation, and circulation in various kinds.

Bhabha proposed the notion of scale as a central term which could be used to cohere a variety of issues related to the global and to the humanities, and to the work of constituting a curriculum adequate to these problems. For Bhabha, scale is an internal montage of representation and measure, and the scalar is indebted to both the political and the ethical. As such, it is perhaps the appropriate mode through which to ask what kind of pedagogy a global humanities curriculum might espouse. Questions of what it would mean to scale, to change scale, to scale, and to whom and to what such changes would affect were central issues put up for discussion. Bhabha asked, under what historical, institutional, and social pressures should the humanities pursue a different notion of the scalar.

Other issues raised were issues of the sensory, archive, and temporality. For example, the question of sound and affect was raised in the question of building an archive, and what exactly, for whom exactly, and around what exactly the archive related to the project of the curricular might be. Additionally, how might questions of decolonisation — scales and fronts of decolonisation — affect the work of producing a curriculum. These questions were intimately connected to matters of citizenship: what would it mean to talk about the citizen in the current refugee crisis, and alongside notions of the displaced and alterity? Similarly, matters pertaining to the term Global South were raised, and it was asked why the language has not shifted to speaking of Global Souths, given the now shared experiences of urban peripheral life across the world (India and California both share experiences of load-shedding).

Premesh Lalu offered a critical intervention by highlighting a tension between curriculum and university. This tension — which Lalu argued was becoming increasingly apparent as we witness the Kantian university come apart — is part of a tide which has not only come to redefine what the university thinks it ought to be doing now but also what the standpoints of the university are; what it says it is and what it is, now, in relation to the world. Lalu pointed out that through an attention to the ways in which the questions of the global south and the figure of the south had emerged as a very easy reference for an older geopolitics and distribution of knowledge (seen perhaps most tellingly in area studies) that race has been the site of an invention of the university. What is now coming apart in the university is the consequence of an over-dependence on race as the organising principle of the university, Lalu argued, and it is a situation that beckons us to attach the debate on curriculum to the very question of what the university is for. Indeed, as Lalu pointed out, words such as creativity, innovation and invention have been produced to support “fantasies that lead to despair”. What is required, Lalu suggested, is a set of terms invoked in relation to the curricular to counter the ways in which the university functions as a supplementary instrument of governmentality, and inaugurate a different space of invention in the university. Lalu offered three terms with which to work: duration (in the Bergsonian sense and invoked to counter a ‘university overrun by speed’ and to invite ‘pedagogic spaces of encounter with the arts and the aesthetic that may draw out time’), memory (to recover what has been surrendered to informatics in the university and to imagine archive as assemblage instead of storehouse), and sensibility (as a different way of approaching the question of aesthetic reception). Lalu also put on the table three critical assemblages that would need to be rearranged to rethink the problem of race: technology, memory, and ethics of the self. Lalu asked what it would mean to ask for a university that aims towards the unprecedented, and the curriculum as the site where we might set to work to rearrange the university.

To the notions of duration, memory, and sensibility, both Ross Truscott and Jim Chandler provided some input, with Truscott suggesting that the question of sensibility, if read through media theory, offered some ways into thinking about issues of the university and education. It is through the notion of media and medium that Truscott argued the issue of receptive capacity and more specifically the idea of ratio might be attended to more rigorously, an issue that would arise repeatedly in discussions around technology, pedagogy, and the changing circumstances in which the global and the humanities makes itself known. By convening a class with a different ratio of the senses, Truscott suggested, we might move away from a media itinerary or a displacement of race. Later Chandler would draw attention to the ways in which Bhabha’s notions of the taxonomic and the tropic reflect the ways in which a concept of the global must be arrived at in a transitional and translational way, one that might read the concepts of duration, temporality, and knowledge as counter to the university’s speed, simultaneity, and information. Bhabha too argued that it is in duration that the institution might most intimately be reflected, and asked what kind of tempi we are faced with in the institution today, and whether asking what it means to accrue knowledge and make progress in thinking may bring us closer to imagining a curricular temporality. Bhabha brought ethics to bear on the curricular in this moment, suggesting that it is in an ‘ethics of enunciation’ that a ‘position where {one} comes face to face with another’ may ‘bridge the area between individuals and the collective without setting up the binary that all the collective is, is a collection of individuals’.

The question of collectives, and what it would mean to constitute a collective in the context of a flailing university system, was taken up in calls for a more direct ethics of care in relation to the university becoming the site of increased mangerialisation. Helene Strauss underscored the ways in which the university as a negatively affectively charged space rendered the emotional affective work done by women invisible, and how bodies carry archives of relentless care. This echoed Suren Pillay’s observations that what was a telling aspect of the crisis in universities was an inability to know who its publics are, and an inability to produce anything other than a local/universal binary in relation to questions of difference.

A long discussion on the growing problem of plagiarism was routed towards the question of implementation by Sara Guyer, who asked what precisely was imagined as the ‘outcome’ of this project. What we mean when we talk of implementation is somewhere between the abstract and the concrete, Guyer pointed out, and asked whether another idea of the curriculum, a different experience in the classroom, or a proposal for an experience in the classroom that might never come was the goal of the project. In very practical terms, Bhabha suggested that producing a model or a framework was not ideal, and that perhaps a publication might be a first step in imagining where the project might go and how it might be implemented. John Higgins pointed out how implementation in any form would need to come to terms with a cohort of students — particularly in the context of African institutions — who simply could not read, or who did not know the ‘difference between information and knowledge’, drawing attention to the technological moment and its impact on knowledge production.

The question of implementation was therefore felt particularly strongly by colleagues from institutions on the African continent, where colleagues such as John Higgins pointed out the ways in which the very real politico-economic circumstances in South Africa and the discrepancy in funding towards disciplines of speculation such as astrophysics (seen in the Square Kilometre Array) demonstrates the ways in which the university is ‘being engineered into a profit driven machine’. Rose Boswell highlighted the problem of massification, and the ways in which the university is being required to provide more and more support to an increasingly impoverished student body. If anything, Boswell pointed out, a global humanities curriculum would have to respond to the encouragement of the commercialisation of knowledge and would have to teach students how to be ‘citizens of the world’.

The problem of implementation came to rest in questions of method. Here, anxieties around the humanities doctorate circulated, with Bhabha pointing out that perhaps that is what is at stake in the conversations at the workshop. Recalling how difficult it had become to think of the humanities PhD as having much currency, Bhabha noted how students have been encouraged to pursue academic journalism and public writing. It became apparent fairly quickly that this was a matter of curricular importance for colleagues from the continent of Africa, as Harry Garuba noted in his comment on minoritized spaces and their need to ‘tap into high theory’. Remarking that race produces a structure of ranking knowledge, Garuba argued that in order to maintain any sort of legitimacy in relation to the research produced, those who found themselves well within racialised formations have to make specific moves ‘through European high theory’ or ‘you are dead in the water’. A curriculum that would respond adequately to these issues and more, Garuba emphasised, has to keep a vital connection to lived experience. The workshop concluded with an expression of extreme gratitude to both the Andrew W Mellon and the Volkswagen Foundations.


This report was compiled by Next Generation Researcher, Aidan Erasmus.

Share
0

Recent News

September 26, 2023

On Non Western Marxisms


Read more

Images: Nafasi Academy. Credit: Kim Gurney

September 21, 2023

Publication announcement: Dr Kim Gurney, ‘Epistemic Disobedience’.


Read more
September 20, 2023

Award Announcement: Aja Marneweck, “Best Faculty Academic Impact: Creative Arts Output Award 2022.”


Read more
September 7, 2023

Oscillations Workshop: Sonic Inquiries and Practices


Read more

Search

✕

Sign Up to our newsletter


Stay up to date with the latest news and developments from the Centre for Humanities Research.




Recent Media

  • Recording: Conversation on Undoing Apartheid
    July 20, 2023
  • RECORDING: Undoing Apartheid, book launch and panel discussion.
    March 23, 2023
  • CHR Winter School, 2022: On the question of the minor
    A reading by Emma Minkley and Kiasha Naidoo
    March 2, 2023
This message is only visible to admins.
Problem displaying Facebook posts. Backup cache in use.
Click to show error
Error: Error validating access token: The user has not authorized application 1123168491105924. Type: OAuthException
Centre for Humanities Research

3 weeks ago

Centre for Humanities Research
Tomorrow, Friday 8 September, Itumeleng Wa Lehulere will be giving a talk at the University of Minnesota’s Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Global Change. Titled ‘Standing Stage Left at South African Theatres’ and scheduled for 19:00 – 20:00 (SAST), Wa Lehulere will reflect on his artistic journey from the late 1970s; what he calls “his comrades marathon” and a “journey of brutality, grief, and healing; breaking and mending,searching and searching...and observing”. Please make time to listen to a conversation about art as a weapon of struggle and resistance. You can livestream by following this link: buff.ly/3P6zCTB. Itumeleng’s life in the arts and political fraternities spans over thirty years. Beginning as an activist in apartheid South Africa, he was renowned as a very influential figure that many young people listened to and followed. He played a significant role in the formation of COSAS in the Western Cape, while playing a prominent role in the church, being part of the choir and playing marimba for the St Gabriel’s Catholic Church. His artistic career started as a poet, musician and dancer who later worked with Gibson Kente Productions in Johannesburg, playing lead roles along side Brenda Fassie in “Hungary Spoon”. Affectionately known as Bra E, he has conceptualized and directed a number of prominent pieces of provocative pieces for theatre, like… “You strike the woman, You Strike the Rock” “Down Adderly Street” “Gap toothed Sisters “Roxy” the musical “Diaries of my Womanhood” “Red Winter” “Echoes of our Footsteps”, all of which were played out in the major theaters of South and abroad, spanning a period of over 20 years. After completing his performance Diploma under the prolific Professor Mavis Taylor, Itumeleng worked with many Directors in Theatre that include: Barney Simon, Janice Honeyman, Ester van Ryswerk, Mark Fleishman. Itumeleng has also worked intensively with the legendary Mike van Graan at the Community Arts Project School of Popular Theatre. His best work appeared at the Market theatre under owners of The Handspring Puppet Companies Basil Jones and Adrian Kholer in a production entitled “Carnival of the Bear”. Itumeleng was instrumental in the forming of the Market Theatre laboratory alongside Mark Fleishman under the leadership of Mannie Manim and Barney Simon. Itumeleng has taught at the following institutions: Alexander Arts Center(JHB), Fuba Academy(JHB,) New world Foundation(CT), Community Arts Project(CT), and tutored at the University of Cape Town Drama School. Itumeleng was one of few actors to be contracted to the Performing Arts Council of the Transvaal(1990). He has since been commissioned by City of Cape Town (writer/director: Affirmative Action Education program) which was converted into a video drama also directed by Itumeleng. Itumeleng then moved on to found and direct for twelve years the multi award-winning Ikhwezi Annual Theatre Festival in association with the Baxter Theatre Center at the University of Cape Town under the astute leadership of Mannie Manim. The Festival was chosen as the Cultural Development Project of the year(2004). Itumeleng is also very interested and involved in writing, directing and acting in television series and movies, the latest of which was conceptualizing, writing and directing the acclaimed romantic comedy "Forced Loved" produced by Penguin Films. Itumeleng was the Artistic Director of the Jozi Bookfair, hosted by Khanya College at Wits University (2014-2016). Wa Lehulere is an intellectual who strives to tell current and thought provoking works, that speak to the times. His approach to theatre is avoiding the over use of props to encourage the actor to use his/her instrument(body and voice) to tell the story holistically. He is in residence with ICGC in August and September 2023. ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Centre for Humanities Research

3 weeks ago

Centre for Humanities Research
We are thrilled to invite you to the keynote address by Gascia Ouzounian at our upcoming workshop, Oscillations: Sonic Inquiries and Practices happening rom Monday, 11 September – Thursday, 14 September 2023 at the Greatmore Humanities Hub in Woodstock. Please note that, although this is an open event, space is limited, so if you want to join us, RSVP via email to Miceala Felix at centreforhumanitiesresearch@uwc.ac.za by Monday 11 September. Gascia Ouzounian is a sonic theorist and practitioner whose work explores sound in relation to space, architecture, urbanism, and violence. She is associate professor of music at the University of Oxford, where she leads the European Research Council-funded project Sonorous Cities: Towards a Sonic Urbanism (buff.ly/44FZJXd). She is the author of Stereophonica: Sound and Space in Science, Technology, and the Arts (MIT Press 2021), and has contributed numerous articles to leading journals of music, visual art, and architecture, covering a range of topics, from sonic memories of the Armenian Genocide to sound in radical Black arts traditions to ‘counterlistening’ and women in sound art. Ouzounian’s recent projects include Scoring the City, which takes inspiration from the graphic score and other unconventional notations in experimental music to develop new modes of ‘urban scoring’ (buff.ly/3fXUFFZ); and Acoustic Cities: London & Beirut, which brought together ten artists in creating works that explore the sonic, social, and spatial conditions of two cities. Oscillations is a project by Akademie der Künste (Berlin) Centre for Humanities Research at the University of the Western Cape (Cape Town) and Deutschlandfunk Kultur / Klangkunst (Berlin). Oscillations is funded by the TURN2 Fund of the Kulturstiftung des Bundes (German Federal Cultural Foundation). Funded by the Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien (Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media). Supported by the DAAD Arts & Media Program, Kulturstiftung Schloss Wiepersdorf and the National Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences in South Africa. For more information follow this link: buff.ly/3sMKrTC. ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Centre for Humanities Research

3 weeks ago

Centre for Humanities Research
Mobile uploads ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Centre for Humanities Research

3 weeks ago

Centre for Humanities Research
#MemoryLaneMonday! Throwing it back to our Winter School in August. We even managed to get schooled by our very own Phokeng Setai at the @norvalfoundation's Berni Searle retrospective, 'Having But Little Gold'. ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Centre for Humanities Research

4 weeks ago

Centre for Humanities Research
We had a wonderful writing workshop and masterclass yesterday with Eoin McNamee, the CHR's inaugural #Maxeke-Robinson Research Chair. If creative writing is, according to McNamee, ultimately an act of bearing witness, then “teaching” writing is really about teaching the art of careful observation, attentiveness, and deep perception; moving from the periphery to the centre and building each piece of writing from the negative space that surrounds characters and effects. Details matter and the writer's craft entails sharp attentiveness to the minutiae of a story in order to activate the reader's sensory faculties. We had the great pleasure of welcoming colleagues from the English Department’s Creative Writing programme and hope this workshop catalyses other opportunities for collaboration. ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Research Platforms

  • NRF SARChI Chair in Visual History and Theory
  • Andrew W. Mellon Chair of Aesthetic Theory and Material Performance
  • Factory of the Arts
  • Laboratory of Kinetic Objects
  • Seminar Programme
  • Publications

Recently Added

  • On Non Western Marxisms
    September 26, 2023
  • Publication announcement: Dr Kim Gurney, ‘Epistemic Disobedience’.
    September 21, 2023
  • Award Announcement: Aja Marneweck, “Best Faculty Academic Impact: Creative Arts Output Award 2022.”
    September 20, 2023
✕

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER


Stay up to date with the latest news and developments from the Centre for Humanities Research.



© 2017 The Centre for Humanities Research. All Rights Reserved. Designed By Spotkolours Design